e8vk
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): November 20, 2006
LEAR CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
1-11311
|
|
13-3386776 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)
|
|
(Commission File Number)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification Number) |
|
|
|
|
|
21557 Telegraph Road, Southfield, MI
|
|
|
|
48033 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(248) 447-1500
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the
filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:
o |
|
Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|
o |
|
Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|
o |
|
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|
o |
|
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure
Lear Corporation (Lear) announced today that it is offering (i) $300 million aggregate
principal amount of senior unsecured notes due 2013 and (ii) $400 million aggregate principal
amount of senior unsecured notes due 2016. The new notes are being offered pursuant to Rule 144A
of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
On November 20, 2006, Lear issued a press release announcing the private offering described
above. The press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by
reference. Lear is furnishing the sections captioned Offering Memorandum Summary and Risk Factors
Risks Related to Our Business set forth in the preliminary offering memorandum for the offering of
the notes so that these sections will be disclosed pursuant to Regulation FD. A copy of these
sections is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.2 and is incorporated herein by reference.
The information contained in this Item 7.01 and in Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2 shall not be deemed
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or incorporated by reference in any filing
under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific
reference in such a filing.
Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits
(d) Exhibits
|
99.1 |
|
Press Release of Lear Corporation issued November 20, 2006 |
|
|
99.2 |
|
Selected Portions of Preliminary Offering Memorandum of Lear
Corporation
|
2
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant has duly caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEAR CORPORATION,
a Delaware corporation
|
|
Date: November 20, 2006 |
By: |
/s/ Daniel A. Ninivaggi
|
|
|
|
Name: |
Daniel A. Ninivaggi |
|
|
|
Title: |
Executive Vice President, Secretary and
General Counsel |
|
|
3
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
99.1
|
|
Press Release of Lear Corporation issued November 20, 2006 |
|
|
|
99.2
|
|
Selected Portions of Preliminary Offering Memorandum of Lear Corporation |
exv99w1
Exhibit 99.1
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Lear Contact:
Investor/Media Contact:
Mel Stephens
(248) 447-1624
Investor Contact:
Ed Lowenfeld
(248) 447-4380
Lear Announces Private Offering of $700 Million in New Senior Notes and Intention to Launch a Tender Offer for Existing 2008 and 2009 Senior Notes
Southfield,
Mich., November 20, 2006 Lear Corporation [NYSE: LEA], one of the worlds largest automotive suppliers, today reported
that it is offering $300 million aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes due 2013 and
$400 million aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes due 2016. The notes will be
guaranteed by certain direct and indirect subsidiaries of Lear Corporation. Lear also intends to
commence a tender offer of up to $700 million for its existing 2008 and 2009 senior notes.
The new notes will be privately placed to eligible purchasers and are expected to be eligible
for resale under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. The private offering of the notes will
be made within the United States to qualified institutional buyers and outside of the United States
to nonU.S. investors.
The notes being offered have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
or applicable state securities laws and may not be offered or sold in the United States absent
registration or an applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act
and applicable state securities laws.
Lear intends to use the net proceeds of the note offering to prefund the repayment or
repurchase of Lears outstanding 8.125% senior notes due 2008 (the 2008 Notes) and a portion of
outstanding 8.11% senior notes due 2009 (the 2009 Notes) through the commencement of a cash
tender offer for up to $700 million (or its equivalent) in face amount. Pending such repayment or
repurchase, the net proceeds will be used for general corporate purposes.
The terms and conditions of the tender offer will be set forth in Lears Offer to Purchase and
will be conditioned upon, among other things, completion of the $700 million private offering
referred to above and other customary closing conditions. Lear intends to offer to purchase the
2008 Notes for cash at a purchase price of 1,045 per 1,000 principal amount at maturity
plus accrued interest and the 2009 Notes at a purchase price of $1,055 per $1,000 principal amount
at maturity plus accrued interest.
This news release is not an offer to purchase, nor a solicitation of an offer to sell, any
securities.
Lear Corporation is one of the worlds largest suppliers of automotive interior systems and
components. Lear provides complete seat systems, electronic products and electrical distribution
systems and other interior products. With annual net sales of $17.1 billion in 2005, Lear ranks
#127 among the Fortune 500. Lears world-class products are designed, engineered and manufactured
by a diverse team of 111,000 employees at 286 locations in 34 countries. Lears headquarters are in
Southfield, Michigan, and Lear is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol [LEA].
Further information about Lear is available on the Internet at
http://www.lear.com.
Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results may differ materially from anticipated
results as a result of certain risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to: general
economic conditions in the markets in which the Company operates, including changes in interest
rates; fluctuations in the production of vehicles for which the Company is a supplier; labor
disputes involving the Company or its significant customers or suppliers or that otherwise affect
the Company; the Companys ability to achieve cost reductions that offset or exceed
customer-mandated selling price reductions; the outcome of customer productivity negotiations; the
impact and timing of program launch costs; the costs and timing of facility closures, business
realignment or similar actions; increases in the Companys warranty or product liability costs;
risks associated with conducting business in foreign countries; competitive conditions impacting
the Companys key customers and suppliers; raw material costs and availability; the Companys
ability to mitigate the significant impact of recent increases in raw material, energy and
commodity costs; the outcome of legal or regulatory proceedings to which the Company is or may
become a party; unanticipated changes in cash flow, including the Companys ability to align its
vendor payment terms with those of the Companys customers; the finalization of the Companys
restructuring strategy; the outcome of negotiations with respect to the Companys North American
interior segment; and other risks described from time to time in the Companys Securities and
Exchange Commission filings. In addition, no assurances can be given that the proposed private
offering of senior notes and tender offer referred to in this news release will be completed on the
terms contemplated or at all.
The forward-looking statements in this press release are made as of the date hereof, and the
Company does not assume any obligation to update, amend or clarify them to reflect events, new
information or circumstances occurring after the date hereof.
exv99w2
Exhibit 99.2
Selected Portions of Preliminary Offering Memorandum of Lear Corporation
OFFERING MEMORANDUM SUMMARY
Lear Corporation
General
Our company was founded in 1917 as American Metal Products Corporation. Through a
management-led buyout in 1988, Lear established itself as a private seat assembly operation for the
North American automobile market with annual sales of approximately $900 million. We completed our
initial public offering in 1994, at a time when customers increasingly were seeking suppliers that
could provide complete automotive interior systems on a global basis. Between 1993 and 2000, there
was rapid consolidation in the automotive supplier industry, and during that time, we made 17
strategic acquisitions. These acquisitions assisted in transforming Lear from primarily a North
American automotive seat assembly operation into a global tier 1 supplier of complete automotive
interior systems, with capacity for full design, engineering, manufacture and delivery of the
automotive interior.
Today, we have operations in 34 countries and rank #127 among the Fortune 500 list of publicly
traded U.S. companies. We are a leading global automotive supplier with 2005 net sales of $17.1
billion. Our business is focused on providing complete seat systems, electrical distribution
systems and various electronic products, and we supply every major automotive manufacturer in the
world. In seat systems, we believe we hold a #2 position globally based on seat units sold, in a
market we estimate at $45 to $50 billion. In electrical distribution systems, we believe we hold a
#3 position in North America and a #4 position in Europe based on units sold, in a global market we
estimate at $15 to $20 billion.
We have a history of growth and strong cash flow generation. Our last major acquisition, UT
Automotive, Inc. (UT Automotive), provided us with the advantage of being able to integrate
electrical distribution systems throughout the automotive interior and was completed in 1999.
Between 2000 and 2004, we focused on strengthening our balance sheet and leveraging our total
interior capabilities. During this period, we reduced net debt by $1.4 billion and were awarded
the industrys first ever total interior integrator program by General Motors for the 2006 Cadillac
DTS and Buick Lucerne models.
We have pursued a global strategy, aggressively expanding our operations in Europe, Central
America, Africa and Asia. Since 2000, we have realized an 11% compound annual growth rate in net
sales outside of North America, with 46% of our 2005 sales coming from outside of North America.
Our Asian-related sales (on an aggregate basis, including both consolidated and unconsolidated
sales) have grown from $800 million in 2002 to an estimated $2.5 billion in 2006. We expect
additional Asian-related sales growth in 2007, led by expanding relationships with Hyundai, Nissan
and Toyota.
Our platform mix is well diversified. In 2005, our sales were comprised of the following
vehicle categories: 54% cars, including 23% mid-size, 15% compact, 14% luxury/sport and 2%
full-size, and 46% light truck, including 25% sport utility and 21% pickup and other light truck.
We have expertise in all platform segments of the automotive market and expect to continue to win
new business in line with the market trends. As an example, in North America, our revenues in the
fast growing crossover segment, as a percentage of our total revenues, are in-line with the
crossovers total share of the market.
Since early 2005, the North American automotive market has become increasingly challenging.
Higher fuel prices have led to a shift in consumer preferences away from SUVs, and our North
American customers have faced increasing competition from foreign competitors. In addition, higher
commodity costs (principally, steel, copper, resins and other oil-based commodities) have caused
margin pressure in the sector. In response, our North American customers have reduced production
levels on several of our key platforms and have taken aggressive actions to reduce costs. As a
result, we experienced a significant decrease in our operating earnings in 2005 in each of our
product segments. Although production volumes remain lower in 2006 on many of our key platforms,
production schedules are less volatile. Our seating business has demonstrated improved operating
performance in 2006.
The negative impact of the recent industry environment has been more pronounced in our
interior business. This business, which includes instrument panels and cockpit systems, headliners
and overhead systems, door panels, flooring and acoustic systems
and interior trim, represented $3.1 billion of net sales in 2005. The interior segment is
more capital intensive and sensitive to fluctuations in commodity prices, particularly resins. It
is also characterized by overcapacity and a relatively fragmented supplier base. Further
consolidation and restructuring is required to return this market segment to an appropriate profit
level. When our major customers indicated an intent to focus on interior component purchases
rather than total interior integration, we decided to exit this segment of the interior market and
focus on the product lines for which we can provide more value. In October 2006, we completed the
contribution of substantially all of our European interior business to International Automotive
Components Group, LLC (IAC), a joint venture with WL Ross & Co. LLC (WL Ross) and Franklin
Mutual Advisers, LLC (Franklin), in exchange for a one-third equity interest in IAC. With
respect to our North American interior business, we are currently in discussions with WL Ross and
Franklin to pursue a similar strategic solution. See -Recent Developments. We believe
that with a global footprint, IAC will be well positioned to participate in a consolidation of this
market segment and become a strong interior supplier.
Within our core product segments, seating and electronic and electrical, we believe we can
provide more value for our customers and that there is significant opportunity for continued
growth. We are pursuing a more product line focused strategy, investing in consumer driven
products and selective vertical integration. In 2005, we initiated a comprehensive restructuring
strategy to align capacity with our customers as they rationalize their operations and to more
aggressively expand our low cost country manufacturing and purchasing initiatives to improve our
overall cost structure. We believe our commitment to customer service and quality will result in a
global leadership position in each of our core product segments. We are targeting 5% annual growth
in global sales, while growing our annual sales in Asia and with Asian customers by 25%. We
believe these recent business improvements and initiatives, coupled with our strong platform for
growth in our core seating and electronic and electrical businesses, will drive our profit margins
back to historical levels.
We conduct our business in two core product operating segments, seating and electronic and
electrical, which are described in more detail below.
Seating. Our seating business includes seat systems and the components thereof. Seating
represented approximately 65% of our 2005 net sales. The seating segment consists of the
manufacture, assembly and supply of vehicle seating requirements. Seat systems typically represent
30% to 40% of the total cost of an automotive interior. We are a leading producer of seat systems
for automobiles and light trucks that are fully assembled and ready for installation. Seat systems
are designed and engineered for specific vehicle models or platforms.
Seat systems are designed to achieve maximum passenger comfort by adding a wide range of
manual and power features, such as lumbar supports, cushion and back bolsters and leg supports. As
a result of our strong product design and product technology, we are a leader in designing seats
with enhanced safety and convenience features. For example, our second-generation self-aligning
head restraint, the ProTecTM PLuS system, is an advancement in seat passive safety
features. By integrating the head restraint with the lumbar support, the occupants head is
supported earlier and for a longer period of time in a rear-impact collision, potentially reducing
the risk of injury. We are also addressing growing customer demand for reconfigurable seats with
our thin profile rear seat and stadium slide seat system.
Electronic and Electrical. Our electronic and electrical business includes electronic
products and electrical distribution systems, primarily wire harnesses and junction boxes; interior
control and entertainment systems; and wireless systems. Electronic and electrical represented
approximately 17% of our 2005 net sales. The migration from conventional electrical distribution
systems to electronic products and electrical distribution systems is facilitating the integration
of wiring and electronic products within the overall electrical architecture of a vehicle. This
migration can reduce the overall system cost and weight and improve reliability and packaging by
optimizing the overall system architecture and eliminating a portion of the terminals, connectors
and wires normally required for a conventional electrical distribution system.
Our integrated seat adjuster module has two dozen fewer cut circuits and five fewer
connectors, weighs a half of a pound less and costs twenty percent less than a traditional
separated electronic control unit and seat wiring system. In addition, our smart junction box
expands the traditional junction box functionality by utilizing printed circuit board technologies
and accommodates the increasing demand for additional electronic features by efficiently
distributing the complex network of power requirements throughout the interior while reducing
overall weight. Our solid state smart junction box uses a single printed circuit board, and solid
state drivers provide system cost savings through weight reduction and provide self-resetting fuse
technology to prevent circuit failures. We also intend to participate in the rapid growth in
hybrid vehicles with our high voltage electrical systems, such as are in place in the Ford Escape
hybrid.
2
Competitive Strengths
Leading Market Position. We are one of the worlds largest automotive suppliers based on net
sales. We produce and design complete automotive seat systems, electrical distribution systems and
various electronic products and serve every major automotive manufacturer on a global basis.
In seat systems, based on seat units, we believe we hold:
|
|
|
the #2 position globally, in a market we estimate at $45 to $50 billion; |
|
|
|
|
the #2 positions in North America and Europe; and |
|
|
|
|
the #3 position in Asia, including being the #2 producer of seat systems in the fast growing China market. |
In electrical distribution systems, based on units sold, we believe we hold:
|
|
|
the #3 position in North America; and |
|
|
|
|
the #4 position in Europe. |
We believe our market success is a direct result of providing our customers with innovative
products, on a global basis, at competitive costs with consistently high quality.
Global Footprint and Scale. We produce our products globally, with manufacturing, technology
and administrative locations in 34 countries on five continents. We serve all of the major
automotive original equipment manufacturers and have product on many of the worlds best selling
vehicles. We believe that our global footprint provides a competitive advantage as we are able to
quickly share the latest technology and manufacturing expertise throughout our worldwide
operations. Our proven experience launching new production facilities and just-in-time assembly
operations around the world is invaluable to both existing customers entering new markets and
locally based automakers in some of the worlds fastest growing automotive markets, such as China,
India and Korea. As one of the worlds largest automotive suppliers, we are able to invest in new
production techniques and spread our research and development costs efficiently by serving various
customers over many different vehicle platforms and markets. A recent example is our Lear Flexible
Seating Architecture, a modular system that incorporates many desired comfort and required safety
features utilizing common components that can be packaged in multiple seat systems. Our global
footprint and scale also provide us an advantage in procuring parts more efficiently as we are able
to source products globally in large volumes.
Low Cost Producer. We are committed to providing our customers with quality products at
competitive cost levels. Unprecedented increases in raw material prices and energy costs and
recent production declines by our major North American customers have had a negative impact on our
financial performance over the past two years. We have taken several steps to further improve our
cost structure, including restructuring actions to align our capacity with that of our customers
and transferring manufacturing and sourcing to low cost countries. Some of the historical factors
which have allowed us to maintain competitive costs include: balanced levels of vertical
integration, low capital intensive operations, local labor agreements, lean manufacturing
practices, a limited amount of legacy costs such as pension and healthcare and a significant and
growing presence in low cost countries. We also have partnered with our customers to proactively
reduce costs and eliminate waste by establishing Cost Technology Optimization (CTO) centers in the
United States, Germany, Brazil, the Philippines and Spain. CTO centers provide a venue where our
engineers can meet with customers to benchmark best-in-class vehicles and propose ideas to reduce
costs throughout the entire system without compromising consumer satisfaction. This allows us to
meet our customers price reduction expectations without negatively impacting our profitability.
Outstanding Quality and Customer Service. We believe our commitment to excellence in customer
service and quality is a competitive strength for us long-term. Our strong and growing
relationships with automakers globally are the result of our consistently delivering on quality,
cost and value in every important geographic market for our customers. We have consistently
distinguished ourselves with our engineering capabilities and ability to meet customer needs. Over
the last two years, we have supported our customers through the most extensive launch cycle in our
companys history, with over 50% of our North American sales turning over in 2005 alone with no
negative effects on our quality performance. Our customer oriented approach has brought us new
business wins with our traditional customer base as these customers grow in new markets, as well as
business with new customers throughout the world. As a result of our relentless emphasis on
quality and outstanding customer service, FORTUNE magazine recognized us as the most admired
automotive supplier each year from 2003 through 2005. In November 2006, our strength in
manufacturing was recognized by ASSEMBLY magazine, which named our Montgomery, Alabama seating
plant that supplies seat systems for Hyundai as Assembly Plant of the Year. We were the first
automotive supplier to win this award.
3
Growth Opportunities. A majority of our sales growth since 2000 has been organic. This growth
is partially the result of the increased sophistication of seating and electrical distribution
systems and electronic features as customers are demanding more advanced features and luxury items
inside their vehicles. In addition, we have been focused on geographic expansion and growth
outside of our traditional customer base. We have been successful in expanding our business in the
Asian and European markets, as well as with foreign automakers as they increase market share in
North America. We have a strong and growing relationship with Hyundai; over the past year, we have
launched new seating, electronic and electrical business to support the Sonata and Santa Fe at
Hyundais first U.S. plant in Montgomery, Alabama. We have also won contracts to support Hyundai
business in China and Europe. We recently entered into joint ventures to support Nissan launches
in China, the United Kingdom and North America. The fastest growing automotive market for the last
several years has been in Asia, and it is expected to continue for the foreseeable future. In
Asia, we are supporting both our traditional customer base, as well as developing relationships
with new automakers, including Changan Ford, Chery Automotive, Dongfeng Peugeot, Citroen
Automobile, Honda, Hyundai, Jiangling Motor Co., Nissan, Shanghai Automotive Industry Corp.,
Shanghai GM, Tata Motors and Toyota. As a result of our strong customer relationships, global
footprint, strategic alliances and full-service capabilities, we believe we are well positioned to
continue to expand our business with Asian automotive manufacturers, both in Asia and elsewhere.
Experienced Management Team. Our top executives have extensive experience with the Company and
within the industry. Our Chairman and CEO, Robert Rossiter, has been with Lear for 35 years, and
our Vice Chairman and CFO, James Vandenberghe, has been with Lear for 34 years. Rossiter and
Vandenberghe were part of the executive team that took Lear private in a management buyout in 1988
and then completed an initial public offering in 1994. Our management team has also been able to
successfully manage through changing environments and volatile economic cycles, retaining an
intense focus on the customer as the industry has evolved over time.
Strategy
Our principal objective is to strengthen and expand our position as a leading automotive
supplier to the global automotive industry by focusing on the needs of our customers. We believe
that the criteria for selection of automotive suppliers are not only cost, quality, delivery and
service, but also, increasingly, worldwide presence and the ability to work collaboratively to
reduce cost throughout the entire system, increase functionality and bring new consumer driven
products to market.
Specific elements of our strategy include:
Leverage Core Product Lines. In response to the recent industry trend away from total
interior integration, we are taking a more product-focused approach to managing our business. We
have announced our intention to exit the more commodity-like components segment of the interior
business and focus on the seating and electronic and electrical segments where we can provide
greater value to our customers. The opportunity to strengthen our global leadership position in
these segments exists as we develop new products, continue to expand our relationships with global
automakers and grow with our customers as they enter new markets globally. In addition, we see an
opportunity to offer increased value to our customers and improve our product line profitability
through selective vertical integration. In our seating segment, we are focused on increasing our
capabilities in structural components and selected trim and foam products. In our electronic and
electrical segment, we believe that building upon our junction box and terminals and connectors
capabilities will allow us to provide electrical distribution systems at a lower cost.
Invest in New Technology. Automotive manufacturers view the vehicle interior as a major
selling point and are increasingly responding to the consumer demands for more interior features.
Our Core Dimensions Strategy focuses our research and development efforts on innovative product
solutions for the seven attributes our research indicates that consumers most value: safety,
environmental, flexibility, comfort and convenience, infotainment, commonization and craftsmanship.
Within seating, we provide industry-leading safety features such as ProTecTM PLuS, our
second generation of self-aligning head restraints that significantly reduce whiplash
injuries, and we offer numerous flexible seating configurations that meet a wide range of customer
requirements. Within our electronic and electrical segment, our proprietary electrical
distribution and Radio Frequency (RF) technology provides several opportunities to provide value.
We participate in the wireless control systems market with products such as our two-way keyless
fobs that embed features such as remote-controlled engine start, door locks, climate controls,
vehicle status and location. We also offer the Intellitire®Tire Pressure Monitoring
System, an industry leading safety feature, and infotainment features such as a rear seat
entertainment unit. To further these efforts, we maintain six advanced technology centers and
several customer-focused product engineering centers where we design, develop and test new products
and analyze consumer responses to automotive interior styling and innovations.
4
Enhance Existing Customer Relationships. We believe that the long-standing and strong
relationships we have built with our customers allow us to act as partners in identifying business
opportunities and anticipating the needs of our customers in the early stages of vehicle design.
Quality continues to be a differentiating factor in the eyes of the consumer and a competitive cost
factor for our customers. We are dedicated to providing customer service and maintaining an
excellent reputation for providing world-class quality at competitive prices. According to the
2005 J.D. Power and Associates Seat Quality ReportTM, we have ranked as the
highest-quality major seat manufacturer in the United States for the last five years. In
recognition of our efforts, our facilities continue to receive awards from our customers.
Recently, Toyota honored us for Superior Supplier Diversity and Excellence in Quality for 2006, and
GM awarded us the Best-In Class Launch Execution award for the GMT900 program. We intend to
maintain and improve the quality of our products and services through our ongoing Quality First
initiatives.
Maintain Operational Excellence. To withstand fluctuations in industry demand, we continue to
be proactive by maintaining an intense focus on the efficiency of our manufacturing operations and
identifying opportunities to reduce our cost structure. We manage our cost structure, in part,
through ongoing continuous improvement and productivity initiatives throughout the organization, as
well as initiatives to promote and enhance the sharing of technology, engineering, purchasing and
capital investments across customer platforms. Our current initiatives include:
|
|
|
Restructuring Program: We initiated a $250 million comprehensive
restructuring program in 2005 intended to (1) better align our manufacturing capacity
with the changing needs of our customers, (2) eliminate excess capacity and lower our
operating costs and (3) streamline our organization structure and reposition our
business for improved long-term profitability. We have initiated the closure of 13
manufacturing facilities and six administrative/engineering facilities, with a
cumulative head count reduction of over 6,000 employees. We are targeting the closure
of additional manufacturing facilities. We expect to begin to realize the full benefits
of this restructuring after completion of the program in 2007. |
|
|
|
|
Common Architecture: We are taking actions to leverage our scale and
expertise to develop common product architecture. Common architecture allows us to
leverage our design, engineering and development costs and deliver an enhanced end
product with improved quality and craftsmanship. |
|
|
|
|
Low Cost Country Footprint: Our low-cost country strategy is designed to
increase our global competitiveness from both a manufacturing and sourcing standpoint.
We currently support our global operations through more than 80 manufacturing and
engineering facilities located in 21 low-cost countries. We plan to continue to
aggressively pursue this strategy by establishing expanded vertical integration
capabilities in Mexico, Central America, Eastern Europe, Africa and Asia and leveraging
our low-cost engineering capabilities with engineering centers in China, India and the
Philippines. Presently, about 30% of our components come from low-cost countries, and
our target is to increase this percentage to 40% by 2010. |
Expand in Asia and with Asian Automotive Manufacturers Worldwide. We believe that it is
important to have a manufacturing footprint that aligns with our customers global presence. The
Asian markets present significant growth opportunities, as all major global automotive
manufacturers are expanding production in this region to meet increasing demand. We believe we are
well-positioned to take advantage of Chinas emerging growth as we have an extensive network of
high-quality manufacturing facilities across China providing seating and electronic and electrical
products to a variety of global customers for local production. We also have operations in Korea,
India, Thailand and the Philippines, where we also see opportunities for significant growth. This
growth has been accomplished, in part, through a series of joint ventures with our customers and/or
local suppliers. We currently have 16 joint ventures throughout Asia. Additionally, we plan to
continue to support the Asian automotive manufacturers as they invest and expand beyond Asia, into
North America and Europe. We have recently increased our Asian related business in the United
States through seating and electrical business with Hyundai, seating and flooring business with
Nissan and interior business with Toyota. We have also entered into strategic alliances to support
future programs with both Nissan and Hyundai globally. We intend to continue pursuing joint
ventures and other alliances in order to expand our geographic and customer diversity.
Recent Developments
European Interior Business. On October 16, 2006, we completed the contribution of
substantially all of our European interior business to IAC, our joint venture with WL Ross and
Franklin, in exchange for a one-third equity interest in IAC. In connection with the transaction,
we entered into various ancillary agreements providing us with customary minority shareholder
rights and registration rights with respect to our equity interest in IAC. Our European interior
business included substantially all of our interior components business in Europe (other than Italy
and one facility in France), consisting of nine manufacturing facilities in five
5
countries supplying door panels, overhead systems, instrument panels, cockpits and interior
trim to various original equipment manufacturers. IAC also owns the European interior business
formerly held by Collins & Aikman Corporation. In connection with the transaction, we recognized a
loss on the divestiture of approximately $29 million in the third quarter of 2006.
North
American Interior Business. As of the date of this
Offering Memorandum, we are currently pursuing a joint venture with WL Ross and
Franklin with respect to our North American interior business. We have a non-binding agreement in
principle providing for the contribution of substantially all of the assets of our North American
interior business and $25 million of cash to a newly-formed entity, International Automotive
Components Group North America, LLC (IAC North America). In return, we would receive a 25%
equity interest in IAC North America and warrants for an additional 7% equity interest in IAC North
America. WL Ross and Franklin would make aggregate equity contributions of $75 million to IAC
North America in exchange for the remaining equity and extend a $50 million term loan. IAC North
America would assume the ordinary course liabilities of our North American interior business. Lear
would retain certain pre-closing liabilities, including pension and post-retirement healthcare
liabilities incurred through the closing date. Under the terms of the purchase agreement being
discussed, we would agree to contribute up to an additional $40 million to IAC North America, and
WL Ross and Franklin would agree to contribute up to an additional $45 million, in the event IAC
North America does not meet certain financial targets in 2007.
The North American interior business (which excludes two China joint ventures that are also
expected to be part of the transaction and includes miscellaneous assets and liabilities that
ultimately may be excluded from the transaction) had sales of $2.0 billion and $2.2 billion in the
nine months ended September 30, 2006 and in the year ended December 31, 2005, respectively, and
produced significant segment losses in these periods. The assets and liabilities of our North
American interior business as of September 30, 2006, are shown below (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
649.7 |
|
Long-term assets |
|
|
501.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,151.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
472.1 |
|
Long-term liabilities |
|
|
25.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
497.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
If we are able to reach an agreement, it would result in a substantial, if not complete,
write-off of the North American interior business net assets. We would recognize an investment in
IAC North America for the related contributed cash, and we would account for this investment in IAC
under the equity method of accounting.
In connection with the transaction, we expect to enter into various ancillary agreements
providing us with customary minority shareholder rights and registration rights with respect to our
equity interest in IAC North America. If we reach agreement on the terms of the proposed
transaction and execute a purchase agreement, the closing of the transaction would be subject to
various conditions, such as the receipt of required third-party consents and other closing
conditions customary for transactions of this type. No assurances can
be given that negotiations with WL Ross and Franklin will continue,
that we will reach
an agreement with WL Ross and Franklin on the terms contemplated above, that any transaction with
WL Ross and Franklin will be completed or that any transaction involving the North American
interior business ultimately will be consummated.
Icahn Stock Issuance. On November 8, 2006, we completed the sale of 8,695,653 shares of our
common stock in a private placement to affiliates of and funds managed by Carl C. Icahn for a
purchase price of $23 per share. We believe that the proceeds of this offering will provide us
additional financial and operating flexibility and allow us to make strategic investments to
further strengthen our core businesses.
6
SUMMARY HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA
The following summary historical consolidated financial information as of and for the years
ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, is derived from our consolidated financial statements which
have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public accountants. The summary
historical consolidated financial information as of and for the nine-month periods ended September
30, 2006 and October 1, 2005, is derived from our unaudited financial statements which, in our
opinion, include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair
presentation of our financial position and results of operations for such periods. Our historical
results are not necessarily indicative of our results of operations in future periods. Our
consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, are included elsewhere in this offering memorandum.
The information set forth below is qualified in its entirety by, and should be read in
conjunction with Offering Memorandum SummaryLear CorporationRecent Developments, Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the consolidated
historical financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this offering
memorandum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of or for the |
|
|
|
As of or for the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
2005 (1) |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
Sept. 30, 2006 |
|
|
Oct. 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
(In millions, except for margins and ratios) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Operating Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
17,089.2 |
|
|
$ |
16,960.0 |
|
|
$ |
15,746.7 |
|
|
$ |
13,558.4 |
|
|
$ |
12,691.9 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
736.0 |
|
|
|
1,402.1 |
|
|
|
1,346.4 |
|
|
|
690.1 |
|
|
|
507.1 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
630.6 |
|
|
|
633.7 |
|
|
|
573.6 |
|
|
|
493.9 |
|
|
|
484.6 |
|
Goodwill impairment charges |
|
|
1,012.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
670.0 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
183.2 |
|
|
|
165.5 |
|
|
|
186.6 |
|
|
|
157.5 |
|
|
|
138.1 |
|
Other expense, net(2) |
|
|
38.0 |
|
|
|
38.6 |
|
|
|
51.8 |
|
|
|
60.1 |
|
|
|
29.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes, minority
interests in consolidated subsidiaries, equity in net (income) loss of
affiliates and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle |
|
|
(1,128.6 |
) |
|
|
564.3 |
|
|
|
534.4 |
|
|
|
(24.3 |
) |
|
|
(814.6 |
) |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
194.3 |
|
|
|
128.0 |
|
|
|
153.7 |
|
|
|
45.8 |
|
|
|
(62.2 |
) |
Minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
Equity in net (income) loss of affiliates |
|
|
51.4 |
|
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
(8.6 |
) |
|
|
(14.3 |
) |
|
|
21.3 |
|
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net of tax(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(1,381.5 |
) |
|
$ |
422.2 |
|
|
$ |
380.5 |
|
|
$ |
(62.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(778.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Financial Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
393.4 |
|
|
$ |
355.1 |
|
|
$ |
321.8 |
|
|
$ |
299.4 |
|
|
$ |
290.9 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
568.4 |
|
|
|
429.0 |
|
|
|
375.6 |
|
|
|
268.5 |
|
|
|
414.3 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
560.8 |
|
|
|
675.9 |
|
|
|
586.3 |
|
|
|
106.1 |
|
|
|
228.8 |
|
Other Financial Measures (unaudited): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA(4) |
|
$ |
(610.6 |
) |
|
$ |
1,070.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,042.6 |
|
|
$ |
440.2 |
|
|
$ |
(412.1 |
) |
Adjusted EBITDA(4) |
|
|
663.5 |
|
|
|
1,118.5 |
|
|
|
1,068.1 |
|
|
|
506.4 |
|
|
|
438.3 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA margin |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
Ratio of total debt/adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Balance Sheet Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
3,846.4 |
|
|
$ |
4,372.0 |
|
|
$ |
3,375.4 |
|
|
$ |
4,012.1 |
|
|
$ |
4,162.7 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
8,288.4 |
|
|
|
9,944.4 |
|
|
|
8,571.0 |
|
|
|
8,451.4 |
|
|
|
8,979.6 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
4,106.7 |
|
|
|
4,647.9 |
|
|
|
3,582.1 |
|
|
|
4,139.6 |
|
|
|
4,297.2 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
2,243.1 |
|
|
|
1,866.9 |
|
|
|
2,057.2 |
|
|
|
2,349.7 |
|
|
|
2,291.5 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
1,111.0 |
|
|
|
2,730.1 |
|
|
|
2,257.5 |
|
|
|
1,123.2 |
|
|
|
1,758.7 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Results include the effect of $1,012.8 million of
goodwill impairment charges, $82.3 million of fixed asset impairment charges, |
7
|
|
|
|
|
$104.4 million of restructuring-related
charges (including $15.1 million of fixed asset impairment charges), $39.2 million of
litigation-related charges, $46.7 million of charges related to the divestiture
and/or capital restructuring of joint ventures, $300.3 million of tax charges,
consisting of a U.S. deferred tax asset valuation allowance of $255.0 million and an
increase in related tax reserves of $45.3 million, and a tax benefit related to a tax
law change in Poland of $17.8 million. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes state and local non-income taxes, foreign exchange gains and losses,
discounts and expenses associated with asset-backed securitization and factoring
facilities, gains and losses on the sales of assets and other miscellaneous income
and expenses. |
|
(3) |
|
The cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle resulted from the adoption
of the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R),
Share Based Payment. |
|
(4) |
|
EBITDA is defined as net income plus interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and
amortization. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA further adjusted to exclude
special items and supplementary adjustments that we believe appropriate to reflect
our ongoing operations. We believe that the supplementary adjustments are
appropriate to provide additional information to investors about certain material
items and other special items that we do not expect to continue at the same level in
the future. However, EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA are not recognized terms under GAAP
and do not purport to be alternatives to net income as a measure of operating
performance. Additionally, EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA are not intended to be
measures of cash flows from operations for managements discretionary use, as they do
not consider certain cash requirements, such as interest payments, tax payments and
debt service requirements. Because not all companies use identical calculations,
these presentations of EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly
titled measures of other companies. |
|
|
|
The supplementary adjustments we have made to EBITDA are not in accordance with
current SEC practice or with regulations adopted by the SEC that apply to
registration statements filed under the Securities Act and periodic reports filed
under the Exchange Act. Accordingly, we will present adjusted EBITDA differently in
filings made with the SEC than as presented in this offering memorandum, or will not
present it at all. |
|
|
|
The following table reconciles net income to EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA (in millions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(1,381.5 |
) |
|
$ |
422.2 |
|
|
$ |
380.5 |
|
|
$ |
(62.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(778.9 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
183.2 |
|
|
|
165.5 |
|
|
|
186.6 |
|
|
|
157.5 |
|
|
|
138.1 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
393.4 |
|
|
|
355.1 |
|
|
|
321.8 |
|
|
|
299.4 |
|
|
|
290.9 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
194.3 |
|
|
|
128.0 |
|
|
|
153.7 |
|
|
|
45.8 |
|
|
|
(62.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA |
|
$ |
(610.6 |
) |
|
$ |
1,070.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,042.6 |
|
|
$ |
440.2 |
|
|
$ |
(412.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment charges |
|
|
1,012.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
670.0 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
101.8 |
|
|
|
47.7 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
57.2 |
|
|
|
59.2 |
|
Fixed asset impairment charges |
|
|
82.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
73.8 |
|
Litigation charges |
|
|
30.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.5 |
|
Capital restructuring of JVs |
|
|
29.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain)/loss on sale of JVs |
|
|
16.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26.9 |
) |
|
|
16.9 |
|
Loss on IAC Europe divestiture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
663.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,118.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,068.1 |
|
|
$ |
506.4 |
|
|
$ |
438.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
RISK FACTORS
Risks Related to Our Business
A decline in the production levels of our major customers could reduce our sales and harm our
profitability.
Demand for our products is directly related to the automotive vehicle production by our major
customers. Automotive sales and production can be affected by general economic or industry
conditions, labor relations issues, regulatory requirements, trade agreements and other factors.
Automotive industry conditions in North America and Europe continue to be challenging. In North
America, the industry is characterized by significant overcapacity, fierce competition and
significant pension and healthcare liabilities for the domestic automakers. In Europe, the market
structure is more fragmented with significant overcapacity, and several of our key platforms have
experienced production declines.
General Motors and Ford, our two largest customers, together accounted for approximately 44%
of our net sales in 2005, excluding net sales to Saab, Volvo, Jaguar and Land Rover, which are
affiliates of General Motors and Ford. Inclusive of their respective affiliates, General Motors and
Ford accounted for approximately 28% and 25%, respectively, of our net sales in 2005. Automotive
production by General Motors and Ford has declined between 2000 and 2005. North American production
has continued to decline in 2006 for General Motors, Ford and also for DaimlerChrysler. The
automotive operations of both General Motors and Ford have recently experienced significant
operating losses, and both automakers are continuing to restructure their North American
operations, which could have a material impact on our future operating results. While we have been
aggressively seeking to expand our business in the Asian market and with Asian automotive
manufacturers worldwide to offset these declines, no assurances can be given as to how successful
we will be in doing so. As a result, any decline in the automotive production levels of our major
customers, particularly with respect to models for which we are a significant supplier, could
materially reduce our sales and harm our profitability, thereby making it more difficult for us to
make payments under our indebtedness, including the notes offered hereby.
The financial distress of our major customers and within the supply base could significantly affect
our operating performance.
During 2005, General Motors and Ford lowered production levels on several of our key
platforms, particularly light truck platforms, in an effort to reduce inventory levels. GM, Ford
and DaimlerChrysler have continued to lower North American light truck production in 2006. In
addition, these customers have experienced declining market shares in North America and are
continuing to restructure their North American operations in an effort to improve profitability.
The domestic automotive manufacturers are also burdened with substantial structural costs, such as
pension and healthcare costs, that have impacted their profitability and labor relations. Several
other global automotive manufacturers are also experiencing operating and profitability issues as
well as labor concerns. In this environment, it is difficult to forecast future customer production
schedules, the potential for labor disputes or the success or sustainability of any strategies
undertaken by any of our major customers in response to the current industry environment. This
environment may also put additional pricing pressure on their suppliers, like us, to reduce the
cost of our products, which would reduce our margins. In addition, cuts in production schedules
are also sometimes announced by our customers with little advance notice, making it difficult for
us to respond with corresponding cost reductions. Our supply base has also been adversely affected
by industry conditions. Lower production levels for our key customers and increases in certain raw
material, commodity and energy costs have resulted in severe financial distress among many
companies within the automotive supply base. Several large suppliers have filed for bankruptcy
protection or ceased operations. Unfavorable industry conditions have also resulted in financial
distress within our supply base and an increase in commercial disputes and the risk of supply
disruption. In addition, the adverse industry environment has required us to provide financial
support to distressed suppliers or take other measures to ensure uninterrupted production. While we
have taken certain actions to mitigate these factors, we have offset only a portion of their
overall impact on our operating results. The continuation or worsening of these industry
conditions would adversely affect our profitability, operating results and cash flow.
The discontinuation of, the loss of business with respect to or a lack of commercial success of a
particular vehicle model for which we are a significant supplier could reduce our sales and harm
our profitability.
Although we have purchase orders from many of our customers, these purchase orders generally
provide for the supply of a customers annual requirements for a particular model and assembly
plant, renewable on a year-to-year basis, rather than for the purchase of a specific quantity of
products. Therefore, the discontinuation of, the loss of business with respect to or a lack of
commercial success of a particular vehicle model for which we are a significant supplier could
reduce our sales and harm our profitability, thereby making it more difficult for us to make
payments under our indebtedness, including the notes offered hereby.
9
Our substantial international operations make us vulnerable to risks associated with doing business
in foreign countries.
As a result of our global presence, a significant portion of our revenues and expenses are
denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars. In addition, we have manufacturing and
distribution facilities in many foreign countries, including countries in Europe, Central and South
America and Asia. International operations are subject to certain risks inherent in doing business
abroad, including:
|
|
|
exposure to local economic conditions; |
|
|
|
|
expropriation and nationalization; |
|
|
|
|
foreign exchange rate fluctuations and currency controls; |
|
|
|
|
withholding and other taxes on remittances and other payments by subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
|
investment restrictions or requirements; |
|
|
|
|
export and import restrictions; and |
|
|
|
|
increases in working capital requirements related to long supply chains. |
Expanding our business in Asian markets and our business relationships with Asian automotive
manufacturers worldwide are important elements of our strategy. In addition, our strategy includes
expanding our European market share and expanding our manufacturing operations in lower-cost
regions. As a result, our exposure to the risks described above may be greater in the future. The
likelihood of such occurrences and their potential effect on us vary from country to country and
are unpredictable. However, any such occurrences could be harmful to our business and our
profitability, thereby making it more difficult for us to make payments under our indebtedness,
including the notes offered hereby.
High raw material costs may continue to have a significant adverse impact on our profitability.
Unprecedented increases in costs of certain raw materials, principally steel, resins and
certain chemicals, as well as higher energy costs, had a significant adverse impact on our
operating results in 2005. Raw material, energy and commodity costs have remained high and
continued to have an adverse impact on our operating results in the first nine months of 2006.
While we have developed and implemented strategies to mitigate or partially offset the impact of
higher raw material, energy and commodity costs, these strategies, together with commercial
negotiations with our customers and suppliers, offset only a portion of the adverse impact. In
addition, no assurances can be given that the magnitude and duration of these cost increases or any
future cost increases will not have a larger adverse impact on our profitability and consolidated
financial position than currently anticipated.
A significant labor dispute involving us or one or more of our customers or suppliers or that could
otherwise affect our operations could reduce our sales and harm our profitability.
Most of our employees and a substantial number of the employees of our largest customers and
suppliers are members of industrial trade unions and are employed under the terms of collective
bargaining agreements. Virtually all of our unionized facilities in the United States and Canada
have a separate agreement with the union that represents the workers at such facilities, with each
such agreement having an expiration date that is independent of other collective bargaining
agreements. We have collective bargaining agreements covering approximately 81,500 employees
globally. Within the United States and Canada, contracts covering approximately 20% of the
unionized workforce are scheduled to expire during 2007. The current collective bargaining
agreements of our three largest customers in the United States expire in 2007. A labor dispute
involving us or any of our customers or suppliers or that could otherwise affect our operations
could reduce our sales and harm our profitability, thereby making it more difficult for us to make
payments under our indebtedness, including the notes. A labor dispute involving another supplier to
our customers that results in a slowdown or closure of our customers assembly plants where our
products are included in assembled vehicles could also have a material adverse effect on our
business. In addition, the inability by us or any of our suppliers, our customers or our customers
other suppliers to negotiate an extension of a collective bargaining agreement covering a large
number of employees upon its expiration
10
could reduce our sales and harm our profitability. Significant increases in labor costs as a result
of the renegotiation of collective bargaining agreements could also be harmful to our business and
our profitability.
Adverse developments affecting one or more of our major suppliers could harm our profitability.
We obtain components and other products and services from numerous tier II automotive
suppliers and other vendors throughout the world. In certain instances, it would be difficult and
expensive for us to change suppliers of products and services that are critical to our business. In
addition, our OEM customers designate many of our suppliers and as a result, we do not always have
the flexibility or authority to change suppliers. Certain of our suppliers are financially
distressed or may become financially distressed. In addition, an increasing number of our suppliers
are located outside of North America or Western Europe. Any significant disruption in our supplier
relationships, including certain relationships with sole-source suppliers, could harm our
profitability, thereby making it more difficult for us to make payments under our indebtedness,
including the notes offered hereby.
The inability to complete the divestiture of our North American interior business would adversely
affect our business strategy and financial position.
We believe that, as a result of industry overcapacity, high raw material costs and
insufficient pricing, our interior business segment has been unprofitable since 2005 and we have
decided to exit the segment. In October 2006, we contributed substantially all of our European
interior business to IAC, a joint venture with WL Ross and Franklin, in exchange for an approximate
one-third equity interest in IAC. We are pursuing a similar strategic solution with respect to our
North American interior business and are currently in discussions with WL Ross and Franklin to
contribute substantially all of our North American interior business assets and $25 million in cash
for a 25% equity interest in IAC North America. If we are unable to reach an agreement, it would
result in a substantial, if not complete write-off of the North American interior business net
assets. No assurance can be given that negotiations with WL Ross and Franklin will continue, that
we will reach an agreement with WL Ross and Franklin on the terms contemplated above, that any
transaction with WL Ross and Franklin will be completed or that any transaction involving the North
American interior business ultimately will be consummated. If we are unable to reach an agreement
on terms substantially similar to those described above or at all, our North American business
strategy and ability to improve our financial position going forward may be negatively impacted.
A significant product liability lawsuit, warranty claim or product recall involving us or one of
our major customers could harm our profitability.
In the event that our products fail to perform as expected and such failure results in, or is
alleged to result in, bodily injury and/or property damage or other losses, we may be subject to
product liability lawsuits and other claims. In addition, we are a party to warranty-sharing and
other agreements with our customers related to our products. These customers may seek contribution
or indemnification from us for all or a portion of the costs associated with product liability and
warranty claims, recalls or other corrective actions involving our products. These types of claims
could significantly harm our profitability, thereby making it more difficult for us to make
payments under our indebtedness, including the notes offered hereby.
We are involved from time to time in legal proceedings and commercial or contractual disputes,
which could have an adverse impact on our profitability and consolidated financial position.
We are involved in legal proceedings and commercial or contractual disputes that, from time to
time, are significant. These are typically claims that arise in the normal course of business
including, without limitation, commercial or contractual disputes, including disputes with our
suppliers, intellectual property matters, personal injury claims, environmental issues, tax matters
and employment matters. No assurances can be given that such proceedings and claims will not have
a material adverse impact on our profitability and consolidated financial position. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
11